Produced by Zoran Stefanovic, Frank van Drogen and Distributed
Proofreaders Europe. This file was produced from images generously
made available by Project Rastko.
WHY NOT KINGS.
THE EDUCATION WHICH MAKES FOR WAR.
THE RESULTS OF THE OLD IDEAL.
THE EDUCATION WHICH MAKES FOR PEACE.
COLLECTIVE WORKS.
'EDUCATION AS AN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIR.
THE RUSSIAN TSAR, MR CARNEGIE AND NOBEL.
MOTHERS, PATRIOTS, AND PRIESTS.
THE INTERNATIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION.
TO BRING CHILDREN OF THE WORLD CLOSER TOGETHER.
THE INTERNATIONAL CONTROL OF EDUCATION.
THE THIRD STAGE OF THE EUROPEAN EDUCATION.
THE
NEW IDEAL IN EDUCATION
AN ADDRESS GIVEN BEFORE
THE LEAGUE OF THE EMPIRE
On July 16th, 1916.
BY
FR. NICHOLAI VELIMIROVIC, PH.D.
Reprinted from the "FEDERAL MAGAZINE."
LONDON
"THE ELECTRICIAN" PRINTING AND PUBLISHING CO., LIMITED.
SALISBURY COURT, FLEET STREET, E.C.
THE NEW IDEAL IN EDUCATION.
By Father Nicholai Velimirovic, Ph.D.
"Nature takes sufficient care
of our individualistic sense,
leaving to Education the care
of our panhumanistic sense."
Ladies and Gentlemen,
If we do not want war we must look to the children.
There is the only hope and the only wise starting point. It
is not without a deep prophetic significance that Christ
asked children to come unto Him. In all the world-calamities,
in all wars, strifes, religious inquisitions and persecutions, in
all the hours of human misery and helplessness, He has been
asking, through centuries, the children to come unto Him. I
am sure, if anybody has ears for His voice to-day, amidst
the thunderings of guns and passions and revenges, one would
hear the same call: Let the children come unto Me!—Not
kings and politicians, not journalists and generals, not the
grown-up people, but children. And so to-day also, when
we ask for a way out of the present world-misery, when we
in profundis of darkness to-day ask for light, and in sorrow
for to-morrow ask for advice and comfort, we must look to
the children and Christ.
WHY NOT KINGS?
Why does Christ not ask the kings to come to Him—the
kings, and politicians, and journalists, and generals? Because
they are too much engaged in a wrong state of things, and
because they are greatly responsible themselves for such a
wrong state of things, and because consequently it is difficult
for them to change their ways, their hearts and their
minds. It would be very hard for Napoleon and Pitt to kneel
together down before Christ and to embrace each other.
It would be almost impossible for Bismarck and Gambetta
to walk together. Not less it would be impossible for the
Pope and Monsieur Loisy or George Tyrrel to pray in the
same bench. Every generation is laden with sins and
prejudices. That is the reason why Christ goes only a
little way with every generation, and then He becomes tired
and asks for a new generation—He calls for children. Christ
is always new and fresh as children are. Every generation
is spoiled and corrupted by long living and struggling.
But for a new generation the world is quite a new wonder.
God is shown only to those for whom the world is a new
thing, a wonder. No one, who does not admire this world
as a wonder, can find God. For the old Hæckel no God
exists, just because for him no wonder exists. He pretends
to know everything. Christ means for him nothing and he
means for Christ nothing. Every foolish child, believing
in God and in this wonderful world, has more wisdom than
the materialistic professor from Germany. Christ is getting
tired of an old generation. Sadly He calls for a new
one—for children. In our distress to-day, I think, we should
multiply His voice, calling for Him, for a new generation and
for a new education.
THE EDUCATION WHICH MAKES FOR WAR.
It is called by a very attractive name, the individualistic
education. The true name of it is selfishness, or egotism.
No religion of Asia ever boasted of having been the birthplace
of such an education. It is born in the heart of Europe,
in Germany. It was brought up by Schopenhauer and
Goethe. It was subsequently supported by the German
biologists, by the musicians, sculptors, philosophers, poets,
soldiers, socialists and priests, by the wisest and by the
madmen beyond the Rhine. Unfortunately France, Russia
and even Great Britain have not been quite exempt from this
pernicious theory of individualistic education.
The sophistic theories of Athens of old have been renewed
in Central Europe—the individuum is the ultimate aim of
education. A human individuum is of limitless worth,
said the German interpreters of the New Testament.
Materialistic science, contradicting itself, agreed on that
point with modern theology. Art, in all its branches,
presented itself as the sole expression of one individuum,
i.e., of the artist. The modern socialism, contradicting
its own name, supported individualism very strongly in
every department of human activity. Consequently
modern Pedagogy, based upon the general tendencies, put
up the same individualistic ideal as the aim to be achieved
by the schools, church, state, and by many other social
institutions.
THE RESULTS OF THE OLD IDEAL.
War is the result of the old ideal of education. I call it
old because it is over for ever, I hope, with this war. The old
European ideal of education was so called individualistic.
This ideal was supported equally by the churches and by
science and art. Extreme individualism, developed in Germany
more than in any other country, resulted in pride,
pride resulted in materialism, materialism in pessimism. Put
upon a dangerous and false base every evil result followed
quite naturally. If my poor personality is of limitless
value, without any effort and merit of my own, why should
not I be proud? If the aim of the world's history is to
produce some few genial personalities, as Carlyle taught,
why should not I think that I am such a personality for my
own generation, and why should I not be proud of that?
Once filled with pride I will soon be filled also with contempt
for other men. Selfishness and denial of God will follow my
pride; this is called by a scientific word materialism.
Being a materialist, as long as I possess a certain amount of
intellectual and physical strength, I will be proud of myself.
But as soon as my body or spirit are affected by any illness
(it may be only a headache or toothache), I will plunge
into a dark pessimism, always the shadow and the end of
materialism. Modern Germany was, as you know, the
hearth of individualism, and consequently also of pride,
materialism, atheism and pessimism. The worship of strong
personalities (to-day: Kaiser William and Hindenburg)
holds the whole of Germany in unity during this war, which
is not the case either in France or in Great Britain or
Russia, where the common cause inspires the unity.
THE EDUCATION WHICH MAKES FOR PEACE.
When will wars really stop in the world's history? As
soon as a new ideal of education is realised. What is this
new ideal of education which makes for peace? I will
give it in one word: Panhumanism. This word includes
all I wish to say.
Individualism means a brick, Panhumanism means a
building. Even the greatest individuality (may it be
Cæsar, or Raphael, or Luther) is no more than a brick in
the panhuman building of history. The lives of individuals
are only the points, whereas the life of mankind is a form, a
deep, high and large form.
If a great and original individuality were the aim of
history, I think history should stop with the first man upon
earth, for our first ancestor must have been the most
striking individual who ever existed. Men coming after
Adam have been like their parents and each other. Kaiser
William is not such an interesting and striking a creature by
far as the first man was. When Kaiser William opens his
mouth to speak, he speaks words that are known. When he
moves or sits, when he eats or prays—all that is a nuance
only of what other people do, all is either from heritage or
imitation, and quite an insignificant amount is individual.
Whereas every sound that the first man uttered was quite
new for the Universe; every movement striking and
dramatic; every look of his eyes was discovering new
worlds; every joy or sorrow violently felt; every struggle
a great accumulation of experiences. And so forth. Well,
if one striking individuum is the aim of history, history
should close with the death of Adam. But history still
continues. Why? Just because not Adam was its aim, but
mankind; not one, or two, or ten heroes, but millions of
human creatures; not some few great men, but all men, all
together, all without exception.
From this point of view we get the true ideal of education.
The purpose of education is not to make grand personalities,
but to make bricks for the building, i.e., to make suitable
members of a collective body and suitable workers of a
collective work.
COLLECTIVE WORKS
are greater than personal works. A pupil from the old,
individualistic school would object:
—And what do you think of the work of Ibsen?
I: I think it is incomparably smaller than the ancient
Scandinavian legends.
He: Do you not grant that Alfred the Great was the real
creator of the English Kingdom ?
I: Never. Millions and millions of human creatures are
built into this building that we call England, or English
history, or English civilisation.
He: And what about the man who built St. Paul's
Cathedral ?
I: It is a collective work, as are all the great works that
have been done. The architecture of St. Paul's is one of
the ancient styles, and no style in architecture was ever
invented or created by one person, but by generations and
generations.
He: And what about Victor Hugo and Milton? Are
they not great poets ?
I: Yes, they are if compared with certain minor poets,
but they are not great if compared with the popular poetry
of India or Greece. Mahabarata, the Koran, and Zend-Avesta, and the Bible, are products of collective efforts—therefore
they are superior to every personal effort.
He: Do you not appreciate the great economists and
what they did for the household, and common-wealth in
general?
I: Certainly I do; but their work is too much overestimated.
Not a handful of economic writers, like Adam
Smith and Marx, but the common genius of generations and
generations arranged the house, set the furniture, created
the cooking, constructed towns, invented plays and enjoyments,
customs, language, and so forth.
He: You agree, I think, that Shaljapin and Caruso have
wonderful voices, don't you?
I: Yes, I agree. But don't you agree that a choir of
millions of human voices would be something much more
striking and wonderful than any solo singer since the
beginning of time?
He: Don't you believe in the wisdom of wise men like
Kant and Spencer?
I: No, I don't. I think there is incomparably more
healthy and more applicable wisdom in the popular sayings,
proverbs, parables, and tales of the nations, cultivated and
uncultivated, in Macedonia, Armenia, Ceylon, New Zealand,
Japan, &c., than in some dozen of the greatest thinkers of
Europe.
He: Who is then in your opinion a great man?
I: Only a good man is a great man to me, who is conscious
that he is a cell in the panhuman organism, or a brick in the
building of human history. Such a man is more a man of
truth and of the future than any conqueror, who thinks
that a hundred millions of people and hundreds of years
have waited just for him and his guidance, his work, or his
wisdom.
That is what I would say to a pupil of individualism in
education. And at the end I would remind him of Christ
and His call after the children, and of the new ideal of
education, of panhumanism which stands over individualism,
and of the collective work of people which stands over every
individual work and merit.
EDUCATION AS AN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIR.
It is quite surprising and humiliating that other things
can be discussed and settled as international affairs, before
education. Yet you have hundreds of things regulated by
international laws, and among these hundred things
education is net yet reckoned. You have the International
Institution of the Red Cross, international laws on trade,
fishery, travel, copyright, political crimes, barbarities in
war-time, &c. But this war shows quite clearly that
education—before anything else—should be a matter of
international consideration and regulation. Behold, how
illusory are all international restrictions when the education
of a nation is quite excluded from any control! When the
Nitzschean education of Germany teaches the German
youth to despise all neighbours, all nations and races as
inferior ones, how could you expect the Germans to respect
the laws and regulations about Belgium, and submarines—and
Zeppelin-warfare, and use of the dum-dum bullets
and of poisonous gases ?
If there is anything to be learned from this war it is
doubtless this: The education of youth in all the countries of
the world must become an international affair of the very
first importance.
THE RUSSIAN TSAR, MR. CARNEGIE AND NOBEL.
The Russian Tsar suggested the Peace Conference of The
Hague. Mr. Carnegie built a wonderful Hall of Peace
there, formed several commissions for the investigation of
war cruelties during the Balkan Wars, and founded many
public libraries for the instruction of the poor. The noble
Nobel left his big fortune for the support of the best works
of literature or science having as their aim the general good
of mankind. If I were either the Russian Tsar or Mr.
Carnegie or Professor Nobel I would do neither of the three
mentioned things, but I would give suggestions and material
support to an International Board of Education.
That is the point to start with in the consolidation of the
World. I am sorry to say that no one of these three great
friends of mankind listens to the prophetic words of Christ:
Let children come unto me! and that no one thought that
no great social reform and no real philanthropic foundation
of mankind is possible to realise—yea, even to start—otherwise
than through the children. The Peace Conference,
being rather a law court than anything else, is
beaten by the uncontrolled warlike education of the German
nation. Carnegie's books have been read by grown-up
people who had already got a direction in life, and Carnegie's
Hall of Peace in The Hague is still an office without business.
Nobel's prize was given also to some German professors
who are responsible for the new pedagogy in Germany.
MOTHERS, PATRIOTS, AND PRIESTS.
These three can be the best possible supporters or the
worst enemies of your educational scheme. Mothers by
nature adore their children and excite their individualism.
Patriots try to engage the whole heart and imagination of a
child for its own country. Priests are asking the whole
sympathy of a child for their creed and their church. To
be individualistic, to be a patriot and a believer are the
quite natural gifts of a healthy person. But maternal love
exaggerates very often the individualism of a child and
makes it egotistic and selfish; exclusively cultivated
patriotism degenerates into chauvinism; and exclusive
church education makes a bigot. These three kinds of
people (alas! the majority), egotists, chauvinists and
bigots, will be against an international scheme of education.
But you must say to the sensible mothers: The international
education of your child will not kill its individuality,
but, on the contrary, will use it to the best advantage for
mankind and for itself. You are an enemy of your son if
you educate him to be an egotist and egoist. In egotism
and egoism one has the worst company in this life, the company
which leads to pessimism and disgust of life.
You must say to the sensible patriots: International
education approves of patriotic as of a natural inclination;
only the new education intends to make a window in every
fatherland so that the child may see its neighbours and
stretch its hand to greet them.
And you must say to the sensible priests: The international
board of education will let every child go to its own
church and learn the catechism from its own parish priest;
but it will be brought in touch with the children of different
creeds, and it will pray with them upon the general ground of
all the creeds.
THE INTERNATIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION.
1. It shall consist of the representatives of all the boards
of education in the world.
2. The members of the board shall officially represent
their own country.
3. The board will be supported materially by the respective
Governments, and it will dispose of a great fortune
from private legacies. For all the philanthropists and
peacemakers and peace wishers will support such an institution
rather than any other in the world.
4. The authority of this board shall be equal to the
authority of an international political congress.
5. Its duty will be to control education all over the world,
banishing or restricting individualism, egotism, chauvinism
and bigotism, and promoting by all means panhumanism
by developing the mind for collective work, mutual help,
personal goodness and humbleness and social greatness.
TO BRING CHILDREN OF THE WORLD CLOSER TOGETHER.
Let them meet as often as possible; I mean the children
from England and the children from Serbia, the children
from Russia and the children from France. So they will
know about each other that they all are human beings, and
that they all can smile in friendliness on each other. Let
them travel to each other's country; I mean the children
from Germany and the children from Italy, the children
from Japan and those from Scandinavia. Let them see
how every spot on earth is wonderful in its way, and how
worthy of love, of patriotism. When will the railway companies
and ship companies say: Let the children come to
us? When will they arrange the best trains, better than the
royal trains, the most commodious and decorated with
flowers and flags of different nations and with one special
flag of the Children World Union? When the moment
comes that the wonderful modern communication begins to
help the children to meet each other and to pay visits to
each other, at that moment the invention of steam and
electricity will justify itself. In transferring the troops and
facilitating crime it does net justify itself. Let the word
communication be not only for the sake of crime and for
the sake of bread; let it be for the sake of peace and of
souls.
Let them sing together, everyone in his own tongue; I
mean the children from the East and West and North and
South. You should have been the other day in the Mansion
House when the English and Serbian boys met together,
and have listened to the English singing the Serbian and the
Serbian singing the English National Anthems, and you
would have been fascinated by the sweet revelation of the
future world.
Let the children from the East and West and South and
North, pray together. Why not? Bring them, thousands
of them, to a mountain, upon which our ancestors prayed,
and let them at sunset kneel down and sing some common
prayer that they all know, or, if they have no such common
prayer in their creeds, let them just kneel and silently pray!
Such a silent prayer will do more good than any thousand
years' old discussion about religion. It is very easy to
convince all the children of the world, just because they are
children, that they have one Father in Heaven, and that
they shall send their prayers to Him. But even if they
send their prayers in different directions, they will arrive at
the same place. All prayers, whenever and wherever sent,
go always the same way.
Let the children from the northern ice and from the
tropical heat carry on a correspondence. Millions of letters
are written and sent every day, which mean nonsense and
evil. The post communication will justify itself much more
by bearing the children's mail, with truth and love, than by
bearing perfidious diplomatic notes or letters which mean
nonsense and evil. One of the unforgettable events in
Serbia during this war happened in 1914 on Christmas Day,
when an American ship arrived and brought gifts and letters
from the children of America to the children of Serbia.
This wonderful mail produced the greatest imaginable
excitement among the Serbian children. They were busy,
very busy for some weeks, reading the friendly letters from
so far, and answering them. I am sure they will forget
many sad events of the war, but they never can forget this
wonderful and surprising mail, which made for peace more
than any of the costly commissions for the investigation
of war cruelties, or any of Carnegie's empty, although
wonderful, luxurious halls of peace.
Let the children, the representatives of all the countries
in the world, come to The Hague to hold the International
Peace Congress. The programme of this Congress should
be: Singing, playing, dancing, smiling and praying. They
will meet as friends and speak every one in his native
language, and they will understand each other very well as
friends always understand each other. This Children's
Hague Conference will promote the world peace more than
The Hague Conference composed of enemies, mutually
annoying themselves by obligatory politeness and bad
French.
But, you will ask, who is going to arrange and execute all
this? The International Board of Education.
But, you will say, it will be very expensive? Yes, but,
supposing it will be as expensive as the war, for which of the
two do you prefer to give money—for such a salvatory
experiment or for the war? Yet, I am sure of one thing, it
will cost less than a war.
THE INTERNATIONAL CONTROL OF EDUCATION.
If you do not watch the education of a country all other
international precautions for peace and mutual understanding
will be wholly illusory.
An International Board of Education should control the
programmes of education of all countries. It should watch
that one principle prevails in every educational programme,
i.e., the principle of Panhumanism. It should not interfere
as to the form of education, no, far from that, but look to the
unity of the principle of education upon the whole globe.
It should carefully avoid all the watchwords which make for
separations and wars, like "Germany, Germany over all!"
The child must love its own country, but it must know also
that its country is not the thing over all other things. It
must be taught that God and mankind are something which
stands above its country.
It should control not only the governmental programmes
of education, but it should also watch the mothers, patriots
and priests. It should try to have these three world-powers
not for the enemies but for the allies and missionaries
of a higher, and a panhuman education.
THE THIRD STAGE OF THE EUROPEAN EDUCATION.
There are three stages of the Christian European education:—
1. Compulsory obedience. This was in the Middle Ages
when men were compelled to do the common work by the
authority of the church and nobility.
2. The experiment with Individualism. This has been
since the Renaissance, especially since Rousseau—a personality
put as the centre and aim of education, the abhorrence
of every compulsion whatsoever.
3. Voluntary Obedience. It is the education of tomorrow.
It is a stage where all men will see their mission
in their collective work, and therefore voluntarily enchain
themselves into the panhuman organism, plunging their
imaginative, pointlike personalities into a big and mystic
personality of mankind.
The Voluntary Obedience will mean a voluntary slavery.
We are going to be slaves again, but not by royal or papal
compulsion, but by our good will; we are going to be slaves
as the parts of a body are slaves and servants of each other,
and as the bricks are slaves and servants of a great building.
We are going to be "prisoners of the Lord," as St. Paul
says, instead of being as now the prisoners of our dreams,
imaginations and ambitions.
This war will close a period of a wrong education, and will
open a period of a right one. It will open our eyes that
we may see how we all are one, and how the greatest of us
is nothing else than a bigger cell in the immense organism
of history.
There is no hope for the future in the politicians, or
generals, now struggling. The only hope and guarantee
lies in the children. A new education in personal goodness
making for social greatness is the only salutary war. Therefore,
let us look to the children!
|